Showing posts with label Joseph Cotten. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Joseph Cotten. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

The Ghost Writer (2010)


The tagline for The Ghost Writer should have been 'With great power and money, comes no responsibility.'

We live in a world where bankers ruined the economy, where priests molest children and where the leaders of the free world can break international law through torture, lies and corruption; yet they all get off scott free and with no repercussions. It's a movie of that sort of corruption and in the hands of a lesser filmmaker than Roman Polanski would be a less scathing and suspenseful film and more of a dull and generic thriller. It deals in the same kind of political and social depravity that Polanski has dealt with in the past and already mastered in Chinatown. So why revisit these themes of political and social depravity when he's already made Chinatown? It's because it's needed more than it has in a long time. Sometimes when you start to open your eyes to the corrupt nature of the established order, you need an artist to open the blinds and let the sunshine of truth come in.


The Ghost Writer is the story of a ghost writer(Ewan McGregor) hired to finish the memoirs of former British Prime Minister Adam Lang(Pierce Brosnan)amidst a scandal where he's being accused of handing over terrorist suspects to the CIA for torture. Lang is a mixture of Tony Blair and George W. Bush, though mostly Blair. As played by Pierce Brosnan he has an air of arrogance and sense of entitlement that we've seen a lot of in those two leaders. The ghost writer, which we never get the real name of, is a bestselling hack writer that almost reminds one of Holly Martins in the film The Third Man. In both, the protagonist is a spineless smart ass who's always a few steps behind and way over their heads in what they're doing. They've both read or wrote too many pulp novels and believe that they too can be private detectives in a murder case. Luckily, just like in The Third Man, we have a lead in Ewan McGregor that is likeable and easy to root for. He doesn't quite live up to Joseph Cotten's skill, but in this movie he gets damn close.


The film has a few actors that are surprisingly good and fit perfectly in their roles. Never have I seen Ewan McGregor, Pierce Brosnan or Kim Catrall better. When those names pop up on the marquee, it often isn't a good sign. In this case they not only surpass expectation but are borderline revelatory, especially McGregor and Brosnan. They show that given the right material and director that they're great actors. It doesn't hurt that they share screen time with Olivia Williams in what is a subtle and striking performance as Lang's wife. There are also great small parts played to perfection by the likes of Tom Wilkinson(King Midas of actors), Timothy Hutton, James Belushi and the legendary Eli Wallach.


There is an air of mystery in the atmosphere and in the ghost's conversations with the people around him that so few filmmakers could pull off. This is not only a throwback to the great political thrillers of the 70's but of the thrillers of Hitchcock. Polanski is a master of suspense and he slowly builds it up throughout with an ease and subtlety that is unmatched. It's the kind of suspense that doesn't always end with action, but sometimes with laughter. The Ghost Writer not only has scathing political awareness, suspense and drama, but also great humor. There's many "comedies" that never match the humor utilized in The Ghost Writer. There's also many films that never match the visual beauty of The Ghost Writer either. Sure, it's often overcast and rainy but Polanski's camera is as curious as characters are of each other and they're surroundings. It attempts to see the world in an authentic way, but is also slick and cinematic. Aesthetically there's a great balancing act that is as successful as the pitch perfect script by Polanski and Robert Harris.


The Ghost Writer is a film that proves wrong to all those that say they don't make them like they used to. It's not only a fun night at the movies but a movie with themes and messages that are needed. It's a movie of suspense, drama, mystery, and humor that both arthouse viewers and mainstream viewers can appreciate. It may be the best thriller to come out all year, but also may have the most impressive and haunting final image. An image that is thematically tied to the masterful ending of Chinatown. Instead of a famous last line to latch onto like in Chinatown, we are left to sit, ponder and stew as the haunting sound and image of our projection of freedom blows through the breeze — to be disregarded and lost in the whirlwind of corruption.

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

The Magnificent Ambersons (1942)



"...In those days, they had time for everything. Time for sleigh rides, and balls, and assemblies, and cotillions, and open house on New Year's, and all-day picnics in the woods, and even that prettiest of all vanished customs: the serenade. Of a summer night, young men would bring an orchestra under a pretty girl's window, and flute, harp, fiddle, cello, cornet, bass viol, would presently release their melodies to the dulcet stars. Against so home-spun a background, the magnificence of the Ambersons was as conspicuous as a brass band at a funeral."


This is part of the opening narration by Orson Welles in his follow-up to Citizen Kane, The Magnificent Ambersons. It is with this that I immediately fell for this film and it's melancholy romanticism. It's an opening that Wes Anderson was heavily influenced by and his opening to The Royal Tenenbaums is undoubtedly proof of that. Orson Welles, while having a hard time maintaining his stamp on his own films, still does so with films that have come after him.

I should get to the background of the movie out of the way. The Magnificent Ambersons is a movie that had a very tumultuous post production. Orson Welles left to work on another movie in Brazil and while he did, the studio decided to re-cut it and re-shoot many of the scenes after test audiences called it too depressing. The movie's length was originally 131 minutes and what is left as it is now is 88 minutes. The finished product is only partially Orson Welles vision and work. Regardless of this, it's still considered by many one of the greatest American movies ever made and I'd be hard pressed to say they're wrong.

The movie begins in 1873 and stars Joseph Cotten, Tim Holt and Anne Baxter. The Ambersons are the richest people in town and are the picture of decadence and class. The young daughter Isabelle is being courted by Eugene(Cotten). In his attempt to serenade Isabelle, Eugene falls onto his instrument and ruins his chances with Isabelle as she ends up humiliated. She goes on to marry another man and they have a son named George(Holt). Georgie grows to be a spoiled man that can be described as an arrogant mama's boy who thinks the world owes him everything.



Soon Eugene comes back into the picture and through subtle gestures and words it is made obvious that there are still feelings there, that they've always been there with Eugene and Isabelle. Eugene arrives with his daughter Lucy(Anne Baxter) and George becomes possessive of her and jealous of the attention she gets from other men. Despite the fact that Lucy becomes a romance for George, he can't help but step on his own feet by being rude to his possible future father-in-law and/or stepfather Eugene.

It is within this narrative that we are introduced to such a great display of romantic longing between Eugene and Isabelle in their older age. They've lost time with one another and are still having a hard time being together. This along with the juxtaposition of the brashness and naivety of George brings a great comparison in the ages and their wisdom or lack thereof. George is so caught up with disliking Eugene that he has a hard time convincing Lucy of his love for her. Lucy isn't so excited that George has no career aspirations as he implies working is beneath him.



I have a hard time finding many faults with this movie. Despite the tacked on ending, it still worked for me in the context of the film. Despite many scenes not having Welles' directorial touch, they still are able to bring emotion and entertainment to the table. The performances are all great, especially that of Joseph Cotten with whom I've never been disappointed. Every aspect of the production no matter how troubled comes together to make a beautiful picture.

And with that, I hope you seek out and bask in the magnificence of the Ambersons.